Scaling Cleaner Freight Movement

Low Viscosity Engine Lubricant

In a truck’s engine, mechanical losses from pumping and friction consume approximately 16% of the total energy input of the vehicle. Lower viscosity oils—oils with less internal resistance to flow—will reduce these engine mechanical losses, thereby reducing fuel use.

Since 2003 fleets have been ramping up their investment in lower-viscosity lubricants. Yet while 40% of the largest, most efficiency-conscious fleets have adopted these engine oils, the adoption rates for the industry as a whole remain at only about 20%. However, new emissions regulations and the advent of new oil categories may increase the adoption rate.

Benefits

Fuel Savings

  • 0.5% – 1.5% when switching from 15W-40 to 5W/10W-30
  • 0.4% – -0.7% when switching to FA-4 oils, available after December 2016 from CJ-4/CK-4 5/10W-30 oils

Extended Oil Drain Intervals
Ability to extend oil drain varies, but one fleet expects to extended its drain interval by 20,000 miles.

Challenges

Cost

  • Increased costs for fleets using non-synthetic 15W-40 oils because most 15W-40 oils are mineral based and most low-viscosity oils are synthetic or synthetic blend
  • 30% to 40% cost increase when switching from a mineral-based to a synthetic-based oil

Compatibility with the Entire Fleet

Common Fleet Strategies

Case Study: National Truckload Carrier

The national carrier had been using a 15W-40 mineral-based oil. An oil supplier approached the carrier to test 10W-30 engine oil. The fleet agreed to the test to improve cold-weather starting and fuel efficiency.
The fleet anticipated a 0.5% fuel consumption benefit. It faced a significant cost increase but calculated it would earn an acceptable ROI as a result of the fuel savings.
Drain intervals were kept the same and in the two years since the switch the fleet has found no issues related to lower-viscosity oil.

Case Study: Carrier with Dedicated Operations

The national truckload carrier had considered switching to a 10W-30 oil. The fleet manager consulted with the engine supplier about available options.
Thirty vehicles were chosen for testing which included extending oil drain intervals. Oil sampling was conducted every 5,000 miles.
The fleet’s fuel testing indicated a reduction in fuel consumption of 1.5% to 1.8%. The fleet then rolled out the low-viscosity oil to its own maintenance facilities and at its offsite facilities.

What People Are Saying

Oil Companies

Engine Makers

Decision-Making Tools

The study team developed three tools to help fleets make decisions about low-viscosity engine oil. The Confidence Matrix plots where the low-viscosity engine oil choices fall in terms of available data on the technology and how quickly fleets should realize payback. The Decision Guide can help fleets that want to benefit from the reduced fuel consumption offered by lower-viscosity engine oil. It describes the fleet’s current oil use and suggests what action a fleet needs to take.

Conclusions

Back to top